Submissions by topics "MA6.1"
|
I agree/support retaining St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands for the following reasons:
Compliance with National Planning framework, enhance amenity, preserve heritage, transition to climate...
|
To whom it may concern
I wish to express my full support for retaining St Edmundsbury as High Amenity lands for the following reasons;
This site...
|
|
Thank you for considering this submission. I am writing to strongly oppose any attempt to rezone the St. Edmundsbury lands in Lucan and to request that they be retained as High Amenity (HA) lands...
|
I fully support the proposed material alteration to retain St. Edmundsbury as High Amenity lands.
As a local resident, I believe this area is an irreplaceable natural asset...
|
|
I would like to add my voice to all the other people objecting to changing St Ed’s from high amenity to residential.
mat Edmundsbury Is one of the last totally natural piece of land near... |
Compliance with the national planning framework, enhance amenity, perserve heritage, transition to a climate resilient society.
We really need to peserve this beautiful amenity for our well...
|
|
Hello please please reconsider your plans to change this land. This natural land is so important to the local population. It is fantastic amenity that is used and loved by locals. There is such a...
|
To whom it may concern;
I am writing in support of keeping St Edmundsbury and Finnstown as High Amenity Lands. These areas provide vital green spaces to our local communities. From an...
|
|
I wish to object to any proposed rezoning or material alteration to the land use at St. Edmundsbury, Lucan.
The lands have been an integral part of Lucan for centuries. Since I moved here in...
|
I strongly support the proposal to retain St. Edmundsbury as High Amenity lands.
Having lived in Lucan for many years, I have seen first-hand how important our remaining green spaces are to the...
|