Submissions by topics "MA6.1"Glac síntiús le Submissions by topics "MA6.1"

Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing as a Lucan resident to ask that the decision of the elected members to retain the existing High Amenity (HA-LV) zoning at St. Edmundsbury be upheld. Like many...
I wholeheartedly support elected members decision not to rezone St. Edmundsbury lands for residential development. Furthermore, I want to express my dismay at public consultation and community...
  I support the retaining of St Edmundsbury as a high amenity land for the following reasons; It complies with the National Planning Framework enhanced amenity, preserving heritage, and a...
I Kim McCrave, strongly support retaining St. Edmundsbury as High Amenity lands. St. Edmundsbury is a valuable natural space that supports wildlife, protects biodiversity, and provides an...
I strongly support the retention of St. Edmundsburys status as high amenity. This is a unique parcel of land joining the liffey valley. The nearby population is large and getting larger.  Saint...
I, John Roche strongly support the decision of
the elected members of South Dublin County Council not to proceed with the
proposed residential rezoning of the lands at St. Edmundsbury...
Ref:   Support for omission of Ref no. 6. I strongly support the decision of the elected members of South Dublin County Council not to proceed...
  I wish to express my support for a number of the Material Alterations proposed following the decisions of the Elected Members of South Dublin County Council. The purpose of Variation No....
I support keeping St Edmundsbury as High Amenity land and oppose any plans to rezone it for housing. St Edmundsbury supports biodiversity and provides wildlife habitats. Developing this land...
I wish to express my support for a number of the Material Alterations proposed following the decisions of the Elected Members of South Dublin County Council. The purpose of Variation No. 2 is...