Submissions by topics "MA6.1"
|
Dear Sir/Madam,
I wish to express my support for the decision of the elected members of SDCC to reject the proposed residential rezoning of the lands at St. Edmunsbury, Lucan, under Proposed...
|
I support keeping St Edmondsbury as critical high amenity lands for now and for the future
|
|
I support the retainion of St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands for the following reasons;
Compliance with the National Planning Framework- to enhance amenity, preserve heritage, transition to...
|
Topic: MA6.1
wish to express my support for the elected members' decision to retain the existing High Amenity zoning at St. Edmundsbury by rejecting the proposed residential rezoning of these...
|
|
I am writing to express my support for Amendment Reference 6 which rejects the proposed residential rezoning of lands at St. Edmundsbury, and retains its current High Amenity zoning
|
We need this area of unspoilt beauty and space
|
|
I support retaining St. Edmundsbury as high amenity lands for the public to enjoy and to protect this area of natural beauty for generations to come. I object to any residential rezoning of the...
|
Please preserve St. Eds as it now stands. Lucan people badly need this space and this area if unspoilt natural beauty for our mental health. Lucan is a high density area of housing, traffic...
|
|
This is an ancient landscape in two ways. Firstly, it has been farmed for at least 1,500 years or more, given the archaeology of the area with many ringforts (or the remains of) indicating Early...
|
I agree/I support retaining St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands for the following reasons;
Compliance with the National Planning Framework- enhance amenity, preserve heritage, transition to a...
|