Uimhir Thagarta Uathúil: 
SD-C444-34
Stádas: 
Submitted
Údar: 
Sudip Andayil

Amendment No.9

Caibidil: 
Ábhair: 

I object to this proposed amendment, particularly the Council’s intention to avoid

allocating individual parking spaces to residents.

•

•

•

Residents in developments such as Parkleigh and Cooper Square already have

allocated parking. I am concerned about what the proposed changes would mean

for existing developments and how parking would be managed and enforced in

practice.

Unallocated parking directly contradicts the Council’s push for EV adoption. In

existing developments like Parkleigh, allocated spaces allow residents to invest their

own money in installing home EV chargers. Without assigned spaces, neither

residents nor Owners’ Management Companies (OMCs) have certainty about where

to install EV chargers or who will cover the cost. This leaves neighbourhoods stuck

with the minimum 10% provision.

These restrictions are being introduced before public transport projects (DART+ SW,

BusConnects) are delivered. Until viable alternatives exist, restricting resident

parking will only lead to overspill onto surrounding roads.

Instead of prematurely restricting resident parking, we ask South Dublin County Council to

consider the following practical measures:

•

•

•

Investigate the use of undeveloped building sites (e.g. future school or employment

building site) as a temporary overflow parking until public transport projects are

delivered.

Increase commuter and visitor parking near the urban cores.

Increase public transportation including bus and trains on weekdays and weekends and extra services during peak hours