Submissions by topics "MA6.1"
|
I Kim McCrave, strongly support retaining St. Edmundsbury as High Amenity lands.
St. Edmundsbury is a valuable natural space that supports wildlife, protects biodiversity, and provides an...
|
I strongly support the retention of St. Edmundsburys status as high amenity.
This is a unique parcel of land joining the liffey valley. The nearby population is large and getting larger. Saint...
|
|
I, John Roche strongly support the decision of
the elected members of South Dublin County Council not to proceed with the proposed residential rezoning of the lands at St. Edmundsbury... |
Ref:
Support for omission of Ref no. 6.
I strongly support the decision of the elected members of South Dublin County Council not to proceed...
|
|
I wish to express my support for a number of the Material Alterations proposed following the decisions of the Elected Members of South Dublin County Council.
The purpose of Variation No....
|
I support keeping St Edmundsbury as High Amenity land and oppose any plans to rezone it for housing.
St Edmundsbury supports biodiversity and provides wildlife habitats. Developing this land...
|
|
I wish to express my support for a number of the Material Alterations proposed following the decisions of the Elected Members of South Dublin County Council.
The purpose of Variation No. 2 is...
|
Having reviewed the material provided throughout the Development Plan Variation process I wish to support the decision of SDCC Councillors not to rezone the land at St Edmundsbury. These lands to...
|
|
I support retaining St Eds as high amenity lands as this would comply with the national planning framework, keeping focus on biodiversity, preserving heritage and building and retaining a climate...
|
I support retaining St Edmundsbury as a high amenity land. Some Reasons are stated below.
Compliance with NPF; green infrastructure aligns with NPFs focus on biodiversity, Climate action,...
|