Submissions by topics "MA6.1"
|
I welcome the decision of the elected members of South Dublin County Council to retain the existing High Amenity (HA-LV) zoning on the St. Edmundsbury lands in Lucan and to reject the proposed...
|
I support retaining St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands for the following reasons;
Compliance with the National Planning Framework- enhance amenity, preserve heritage, transition to a...
|
|
What I am going to say is St Edmundsbury is such a different place from everywhere else in Lucan. It is lovely there with trees, plants, the river and so many different animals. Everywhere else is...
|
I support retaining St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands for the following reasons;.
Compliance with the National Planning Framework; green infrastructure aligns with NPFs focus on... |
|
I fully support the decision by the elected officials to reject the proposal to rezone St. Edsmundsbury and support MA6.1.
This land should retain the high amenity zoning. It is a green belt...
|
Thankfully the local councillors recognised the need to protect St Edmundsbury and to some degree Finnstown and I am hoping that these protections will now be guaranteed in this second traunch of...
|
|
Hello,
I support retaining St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands for the following reasons;
Compliance with the National Planning Framework- enhance amenity, preserve heritage,... |
I strongly support MA6.1 and the removal of the proposal to rezone the lands at St. Edmundsbury, Lucan.
St. Edmundsbury SHOULD NOT be rezoned for residential development as...
|
|
I strongly support MA6.1 to remove the proposal to rezone the lands at St. Edmundsbury for the following reasons:
This land is part of the green corridor leading into the Liffey Valley...
|
As already stated on multiple occasions in recent times, it is unconscionable that anyone could consider destroying these green areas which are of enormous value to residents and visitors near and...
|