Submissions by topics "MA6.1"
|
I support retaining St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands for the following reasons;
Compliance with the National Planning Framework- enhance amenity, preserve heritage, transition to a climate...
|
I, Catherine Brangan strongly support the decision of the elected members of South Dublin County Council not to proceed with the proposed residential rezoning of the lands at St. Edmundsbury, Lucan...
|
|
I Ciaran Byrne, welcome the decision of the elected members of South Duboin County Council to reject theproposed residential rezoning of St. Edmundbury lands, and I ask that htis decision be...
|
I, Aideen McCormack wish to express my support for the elected members' decision to retain the existing High Amenity zoning at St Edmundsbury by rejecting the proposed residential rezoning...
|
|
I wish to express my full support for retaining St Edmundsbury as High Amenity lands for the following reasons;
• This site represents one of the last... |
I strongly support retaining St. Edmundsbury as High Amenity lands.
St. Edmundsbury is a valuable natural space that supports wildlife, protects biodiversity, and provides an important green...
|
|
I support amendment reference 6 because it protects the St Edmundsbury lands as valuable open space for the community, protects the heritage and biodiversity for future generations.
|
I strongly support the decision of the majority of elected members of SDCC NOT TO PROCEED with the proposed residential zoning of the lands at St. Edmundsbury and to retain the existing High...
|
|
The members of Lucan Tidy Towns wish to express our support for the decision of the elected members of South Dublin County Council to reject the proposed residential rezoning of the lands...
|
I support the proposed Material Alteration removing the proposed residential rezoning of the St Edmundsbury lands and retaining their existing High Amenity – Liffey Valley designation.
The...
|