Submissions by topics "MA6.1"
|
As an architecture student I support Proposed Material Alteration 6.1 retaining the High Amenity zoning at St Edmundsbury.
Good planning is about creating places that remain successful over many...
|
I support the decision to retain St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands.
The lands are an important asset for wildlife and the Liffey Valley should be preserved as an ecological corridor as much...
|
|
I urge the planners not to grant planning permission to develop the lands at St Edmunsbury as suggested. They should be left as they are, for the sake of wildlife, biodiversity and green...
|
As a life long Lucan resident I would like to to express my strong support to the proposal to maintain the lands at St Edmundsbury as High Amenity lands.
The environmentally sensitive area of...
|
|
I strongly object to any residential rezoning of the lands at St. Edmundsbury, Lucan, and fully support the proposed omission/reversal of residential rezoning proposals for these lands (as...
|
I support Proposed Material Alteration 6.1 retaining the High Amenity (HA-LV) zoning at St Edmundsbury.
The existing High Amenity designation provides an important strategic safeguard for the...
|
|
To whom it concerns
We have very little green spaces left in lucan, grangecastle Rd, lucan road and Newcastle Rd to mention are saturated most days.
Once you build green amenities are...
|
I wish to express my support for the elected members' decision to retain the existing High Amenity (HA-LV) zoning at St. Edmundsbury and to reject the proposed residential rezoning of these lands...
|
|
I would like to state that I agree with the SDCC Cllrs vote in June not to rezone the land at St Edmundsbury for housing.
There has been an overwhelming amount of support not to rezone this...
|
Edmunsbury and Finnstown Castle (mentioned in earlier submission) are some of the few untouched areas left in Lucan. Wildlife and green spaces need to be protected and not forsaken for more...
|