Submissions by topics "MA6.1"
|
I support the recent vote against rezoning St Edmonsbury and retain it as High Amenity.
This is in compliance with the National Planning Framework.
I grew up in Lucan and visit family...
|
I wish to strongly support the democratic decision of the elected members of South Dublin County Council to reject the proposed rezoning of the lands at St. Edmundsbury from High Amenity (HA-LV) to...
|
|
We, the Hermitage Park Residents Association, strongly support the addition of MA6.1 to remove the proposal to rezone the lands at St. Edmundsbury for the following reasons:
These lands are...
|
Correct decision reached to omit this site from any rezoning.
This must be upheld. SDCC has a responsibility to ensure there is sufficient land available to meet Government... |
|
These lands in St. Edmundsbury are currently High Amenity (HA-LV), a designation which exists to protect and enhance the outstanding character and amenity of the Liffey Valley. The South Dublin...
|
Position: I fully support MA6.1 and request that South Dublin County Council omit Amendment No. 6 (St. Edmundsbury), including the related CS7/SLO6 designations, and retain the current High Amenity...
|
|
I am writing in support of Amendment Reference 3 in order to retain the St Edmundsbury and wider Finnstown Castle lands, and the removal of the proposed residential zoning of this area. This area...
|
I would like to make a submission to say I support the motion by SDCC Cllrs to SCRAP the rezoning St Edmundsbury lands to build houses. regards, Cristina |
|
Lucan has seen huge development in the 21 years since I was born. Even without rezoning St Edmundsbury and Finnstown, the council is talking about Lucan taking half the development in the council...
|
I support retaining St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands for the following reasons;
Compliance with the National Planning Framework- enhance amenity, preserve heritage, transition to a climate...
|