Submissions by topics "MA6.1"
|
I strongly support the Councillors vote NOT to rezone St Edmundsbury. The area has already been failed in proper traffic management making daily movement in the area a nightmare for residents....
|
I agree/I support retaining St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands for the following reasons;
Compliance with the National Planning Framework- enhance amenity, preserve heritage, transition to...
|
|
I wish to express my support for the elected members' decision to retain the existing High Amenity zoning at St. Edmundsbury by rejecting the proposed residential rezoning of these lands. The St...
|
St Edmundsbury:
I support retaining St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands.
As you are aware Edmundsbury lands are in a proposed Natural heritage Area and...
|
|
To who it may concern,
I am writing today to make a second objection to the proposed rezoning of the St Edmundsbury lands, conscious that this most recent rezoning effort, having not been...
|
Dear SDCC,
As a life long resident of Lucan I would be very disappointed and heart broken if SDCC changed beautiful St Edmondsbury into residential or commercial use.
As of now it is a... |
|
I agree and support retaining St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands for the following reasons;
Compliance with the National Planning Framework- enhance amenity, preserve heritage, transition to...
|
I wish to submit this formal objection to any proposal to rezone the lands at St. Edmundsbury for residential development, and to confirm my full endorsement of Material Alteration MA6.1 to retain...
|
|
Please listen to the people who have elected you into power and pay your wages - the people of Lucan demand that St.Edmundsbury shall not be developed for residential purposes.
Please inforce...
|
I object to the rezoning of St.Edmundsbury lands. There is enough rezoning in Lucan and it cannot cope with the current traffic levels.
|