Submissions by topics "MA6.1"Subscribe to Submissions by topics "MA6.1"

Chapter: MA St. Edmundsbury
Topic: MA6.1 I, support the elected councillors' decision to reject the proposed residential rezoning of the lands...
I wish you object to the rezoning of St Edmundsberry Farm. It is an integral part of the community living in Lucan where huge amounts oifvthe population walk through the fields. The area is...
I have lived Lucan for 22 years now I’m only 25 and have many memories of going on walks in st Edmund’s with my friends and family and schools. Every time we went we took a different route and it...
I support retaining St. Edmundsbury as High Amenity Land for the following reasons: 1. These lands are highly important as a source of biodiversity for the area. As it stands, a large number of...
Keeping St. Edmundsbury in its current state aligns best with the NPF aims of enhancing amenities, preserving heritage and helping to transition to a climate resilient society.  Development would...
I wish to submit this formal objection to any proposal to rezone the lands at St. Edmundsbury for residential development, and to confirm my full endorsement of Material Alteration MA6.1 to retain...
I am writing as a local resident to object to the proposed residential rezoning of the St. Edmundsbury lands in Lucan, and to support the councillor motion to scrap this rezoning. My grounds...
I am writing as a local resident to object to the proposed residential rezoning of the St. Edmundsbury lands in Lucan, and to support the councillor motion to scrap this rezoning. My grounds...
As an architecture student I support Proposed Material Alteration 6.1 retaining the High Amenity zoning at St Edmundsbury. Good planning is about creating places that remain successful over many...
I support the decision to retain St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands.  The lands are an important asset for wildlife and the Liffey Valley should be preserved as an ecological corridor as much...