Submissions by topics "MA6.1"
|
What I am going to say is St Edmundsbury is such a different place from everywhere else in Lucan. It is lovely there with trees, plants, the river and so many different animals. Everywhere else is...
|
I support retaining St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands for the following reasons;.
Compliance with the National Planning Framework; green infrastructure aligns with NPFs focus on... |
|
I fully support the decision by the elected officials to reject the proposal to rezone St. Edsmundsbury and support MA6.1.
This land should retain the high amenity zoning. It is a green belt...
|
Thankfully the local councillors recognised the need to protect St Edmundsbury and to some degree Finnstown and I am hoping that these protections will now be guaranteed in this second traunch of...
|
|
Hello,
I support retaining St Edmundsbury as high amenity lands for the following reasons;
Compliance with the National Planning Framework- enhance amenity, preserve heritage,... |
I strongly support MA6.1 and the removal of the proposal to rezone the lands at St. Edmundsbury, Lucan.
St. Edmundsbury SHOULD NOT be rezoned for residential development as...
|
|
I strongly support MA6.1 to remove the proposal to rezone the lands at St. Edmundsbury for the following reasons:
This land is part of the green corridor leading into the Liffey Valley...
|
As already stated on multiple occasions in recent times, it is unconscionable that anyone could consider destroying these green areas which are of enormous value to residents and visitors near and...
|
|
I support the recent vote against rezoning St Edmonsbury and retain it as High Amenity.
This is in compliance with the National Planning Framework.
I grew up in Lucan and visit family...
|
I wish to strongly support the democratic decision of the elected members of South Dublin County Council to reject the proposed rezoning of the lands at St. Edmundsbury from High Amenity (HA-LV) to...
|